FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE                                                
March 22, 2018
CONTACT: Ryan Williams




Hold Unions Accountable For Stealing Worker Dues


Heather Greenaway
March 21, 2018
Washington Examiner

Recent months have seen a slew of headlines in union corruption cases all over the country. Labor bosses have been accused or pleaded guilty to embezzling union dues from hardworking rank-and-file members in Arizona, Connecticut, Massachusetts, Michigan, Rhode Island, and Virginia, just to name a few.

This criminal activity highlights the need for the U.S. Department of Labor to step up enforcement and increase financial transparency within unions via stronger disclosure. That is the only way to put a stop to the rampant thievery — and no, that’s not too strong of a word.

In January, Richard D’Antuono pleaded guilty to embezzling nearly $320,000 from the Operative Plasterers and Cement Masons International Association Local 40 in Rhode Island when serving as the union’s business manager and financial secretary.

In February, Stephanie Marie DeBoer, an administrator at the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Local 876 in Michigan, was sentenced for embezzling more than $300,000 in union funds. Some of the embezzled money was used to buy Katy Perry tickets and undergarments. A Virginia woman named Tamika Bullock, a former official at the International Brotherhood of Boilermakers Local 684, was sentenced for embezzling $24,000 in union funds, some of which she used to go on a cruise.

Those are just a handful of the examples from this year, and it’s still only March.

Last October, a Connecticut man named Andrew Thibodeau, who served as treasurer of the International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers Local 1433, was sentenced for embezzling more than $70,000 in union funds. And in December in Massachusetts, the former secretary-treasurer of the Unite Here Local 26 pleaded guilty to embezzling more than $170,000 in union funds.

Then there are the bigger cases. The Detroit Free Press detailed more than a half dozen union embezzlement cases involving the theft of more than one million dollars over the past decade, during which time documents “show embezzlement from hundreds of union offices nationwide.” Moreover, over the course of “just the past two years, more than 300 union locations have discovered theft.”

This is widespread, epidemic theft. Fortunately, we have the necessary solutions to address massive union dues embezzlement. The Trump administration should roll back the cuts made by the Obama administration to the Office of Labor Management Standards, which is charged with investigating union corruption. By gutting the OLMS, Obama made it difficult for investigators to identify union embezzlement. Now, we are seeing the results of that neglect.

The Trump administration made a good first effort in its fiscal year 2019 budget, which takes steps to restore the OLMS’ “investigative workforce” and “strengthen protections for union members by supporting more audits and investigations to uncover flawed officer elections, fraud, and embezzlement.”

The Department of Labor should also revise financial disclosure requirements. In 2003, George W. Bush’s Labor Department gave some teeth to the Labor-Management Reporting and Disclosure Act by requiring unions to disclose total benefits received by union employees and officers, and provide itemized receipts for union expenses. The Obama Labor Department reversed this. Trump’s should reinstate it, along with the requirement that unions file a Trust Annual Report disclosure form (better known as T-1).

Such changes would significantly increase financial transparency at both local and national unions, especially when coupled with increased resources and renewed focus on fighting union corruption with the OLMS. These are good, commonsense reforms that people can get behind.

Almost all other kinds of organizations in the United States, including corporations, government agencies, and nonprofits, are required to disclose such information. With such widespread embezzlement of worker dues, we can see what a mistake it was to allow unions to operate in the dark. Now is the time for transparency, enforcement, and holding union bosses accountable for their actions.

Heather Greenaway is a spokesperson for the Workforce Fairness Institute.

To access the op-ed, click here.

The Workforce Fairness Institute is an organization committed to educating voters, employers, employees and citizens about issues affecting the workplace.  To learn more, please visit:

 To schedule an interview with a Workforce Fairness Institute representative, please contact Ryan Williams at (202) 677-7060.



Featured Blog

AZ Daily Sun--Coconino Voices: PRO Act legislation would hurt local businesses

— 05.13.2021 —
By: Julie Pastrik Arizona businesses and workers have had an incredibly challenging year given the economic slowdown that followed in the wake of the coronavirus pandemic. However, local businesses and industries across the state are resilient and on the road to a strong recovery that will mean more jobs for Arizona workers and increased economic development to strengthen our communities. That is, as long as Congress does not move forward with potentially devastating legislation that would hurt local employers and employees alike while impeding our state’s economic recovery. Unfortunately, some members of Congress seem determined to do just that by pushing through the Protecting the Right to Organize (PRO) Act. As harmless as the name may sound, the PRO Act would have serious repercussions for local businesses, particularly smaller ones, while undermining long-standing rights for employees and threatening the growing gig economy that has helped provide much-needed income for so many during this time. Arizona is fortunate to have leaders like Senators Mark Kelly and Kyrsten Sinema, who have both refrained from joining the vast majority of their Democratic colleagues in cosponsoring the PRO Act. In a slap in the face to Arizona workers, the PRO Act removes one of the most fundamental rights a worker has when it comes to voting in elections to determine whether to unionize: the secret ballot. Instead, workers could be forced to sign union authorization cards in front of other employees, their employer, or union organizers. This bill would also destroy workers’ right to privacy by allowing unions access to personal information, including their home address and personal phone number. If that doesn’t open the door to union intimidation and harassment, I don’t know what does. As if that was not bad enough, the PRO Act would create major new challenges for Arizona businesses, making it harder for them to create jobs, expand in their communities, and even keep their doors open. It would redefine what it means to be a “joint employer” under national labor law, greatly complicating existing relationships between franchisors and franchisees as well as between business owners, contractors, subcontractors, and vendors and suppliers. At the same time, it would interfere with attorney-client confidentiality and make it much more difficult for small businesses to secure a legal advice on labor issues. Particularly harmful during these times, the PRO Act would apply a failed policy from California to national labor law by using the “ABC” test to determine whether a worker is an independent contractor or employee. This makes it much harder to qualify as an independent contractor, threatening the freedom and flexibility that tens of thousands of Arizonans find in independent contracting and gig economy work. Ultimately, the PRO Act is bad public policy that only works for union leaders to inflate their falling ranks while threatening workers’ rights, undermining small businesses, and jeopardizing a growing part of our economy. This is not a good solution for Arizona, and Senators Sinema and Kelly should stay firm and not cosponsor this misguided legislation.
Read More