Congress Takes Important Steps To Rein In Rogue Agency

Fred Wszolek
October 4, 2011
Townhall

Sometimes extraordinary times call for extraordinary measures. And that is true regarding the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) and its job-killing assault against workers and small businesses across the country.

Once elected, it was reasonably anticipated that President Obama would seek to advance the interests of the union bosses who bankrolled his campaign for office. No one expected, however, that he would allow organized labor to call the shots at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue with the head of the American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations (AFL-CIO) even bragging that he speaks with someone from the White House every day, including weekends.

Yet, that’s exactly what has taken place. The administration has bent over backwards to reward Big Labor at the expense of employees and employers. The giveaways have been so breathtaking and extreme it is fair to say that Obama has done more to reward union bosses than any president in modern history.

As a result, a co-equal branch of government has been forced to step forward and defend the interests of job creators in the worst economy since the Great Depression. This has required the Congress to pursue legislation limiting the ability of unelected bureaucrats in the executive branch to payback Big Labor with policies that threaten the ability of our economy to recover.

Just a few weeks ago, the U.S. House of Representatives passed – in a bipartisan fashion – the Protecting Jobs from Government Interference Act (H.R. 2587). The legislation prevents the government from dictating to American companies where they can do business and create jobs. The bill is a necessary response to the incredible overreach on the part of the NLRB, which is seeking to tell the Boeing Company it could not open a second production facility in the right-to-work state of South Carolina; all such work had to be done in it unionized facilities in Washington State.

Next, Congress is using its appropriations authority to prevent the NLRB from over-spending and from using taxpayer dollars to enforce recent decisions that hurt workers and small businesses, and damage our ability to create jobs.

Just this past week, the House Appropriations Committee issued its 2012 Labor, Health and Human Services funding bill. In it, the committee seeks to make reasonable cuts to this over-funded agency, which in fiscal year 2010 had a budget surplus on a substantially smaller appropriation. And while Big Labor’s supporters in Congress will balk, the Inspector General of the NLRB recently issued a report that it was time the agency stopped operating at an unnecessarily high spending level because of significant reductions in agency business. He recommended it “consolidate offices, get out of high rent office space and eliminate overstaffing.”

The House funding bill also disallows Obama’s labor board from punishing small businesses with its activist and burdensome regulatory actions. It prohibits the NLRB from instituting the forced unionization of employees and employers through the formation of micro-units, elimination of the secret ballot, introduction of ambush elections and establishment of electronic voting.

Public polling supports these Congressional actions with large majorities siding with Boeing in its dispute with the NLRB. Even a majority of union workers agreed the company should be able to open its facility where it saw fit. And most Americans believe the regulatory overreach on the part of the Obama Administration is hurting job creation, and they disapprove of it.

But this is not Congress’ only action to reign in a regulatory agency run amok. Recently, the House voted on legislation undoing a rule change sought by labor bosses that made organizing easier in the airline and railroad industries. For nearly a century, the support of a majority of workers was required to form a collective bargaining unit in our transportation industries. Yet, a little known agency named the National Mediation Board (NMB) changed the rule so that only a majority of those voting is now needed.

This will allow unions to focus attention on a small group of workers and increase unionization in our transportation sector with less than a majority vote. This forced unionization of workers is inconsistent with the former rule that has been supported by Republicans and Democrats alike and in place since Franklin Delano Roosevelt resided in the White House.

As President Obama seeks re-election, we can only expect he will continue to pursue measures that encourage labor bosses to make investments in his campaign. In the process, he will trade freedom and jobs for another four years in the Oval Office.

It is necessary and appropriate for the legislative branch of our government to respond and place a check on the executive branch’s reckless approach to policymaking. We urge Senate leadership to support these legislative efforts that will send a message to businesses that their government will not continue to work against them as they seek to create jobs and turn our economy around.

Tell Congress: Stop the PRO Act

WFI is working to prevent passage of the so-called Protecting the Right to Organize Act (PRO Act)—a wholesale labor reform package that takes the current careful balance of labor rules and tips it greatly in the favor of labor bosses and forced collective bargaining.

The PRO Act robs workers of the right to a secret ballot to form a union, forces union contracts on workers without a vote of approval, and expose workers’ personal contact information to union bosses seeking to organize a workplace. And that’s just the start.

Help us speak out against this woefully misguided and blatantly anti-worker legislation. Review and send the message below to your members of Congress today.

Read More »

Not a member? Sign up and become one today.

Featured Blog

WFI Key Vote Letter: Opposition to PRO Act

— 02.10.2020 —
Dear Speaker Pelosi and Minority Leader McCarthy: On behalf of the Workforce Fairness Institute (WFI), I am writing to share our organization’s vehement opposition to H.R. 2474, the Protecting the Right to Organize Act (PRO Act). WFI has serious concerns with the broad, overreaching nature of this legislation and the many ways in which it would undermine worker freedom and privacy, while simultaneously threatening businesses and entire industries that keep America’s economy thriving. Please note that WFI will include votes on the PRO Act and its amendments on our Congressional Labor Scorecard, which scores and ranks legislators based on their activity associated with workplace issues. WFI was established to fight for American employees and employers as well as our entire economy. We believe in worker empowerment, the right of workers to be fully informed of the options available for worker-involvement in the workplace, and the right to freely choose whether to organize or not. No individual or group – government, a union or an employer – should be able to intimidate or restrict workers’ in exercising these rights. In an attempt to boost flailing union membership at the expense of workers’ rights, the PRO Act would upend decades of established U.S. labor law and institute myriad anti-employee and anti-employer policies that have already been soundly rejected—by Congress, various federal agencies, or the courts. Among its most blatant affronts to workers’ rights, the PRO Act would eliminate the right to a secret ballot when determining whether to unionize and enforce a “card check” system, exposing workers to the potential for harassment, intimidation, and coercion. The PRO Act would also enforce binding arbitration in union negotiations by a government- appointed bureaucrat; repeal and eliminate right-to-work laws in 27 states, force workers to fund union activities regardless of whether they support them; and threaten the ability of individuals to operate as independent contractors, eliminating traditional economic and employment opportunities and threatening the independence and flexibility of the emerging gig economy. On top of all that, the PRO Act would force all workers’ personal and home contact information to be provided to a union during organizing campaigns – in an electronic, searchable format no less, with no limit on what a union can do with that information. WFI believes in advancing sensible policies that protect and preserve the rights of both employees and employers, and we welcome the opportunity to work with legislators who also support these efforts. However, the PRO Act does not achieve these goals and would instead threaten the rights of both while jeopardizing our entire economy. WFI urges members of the House to strongly oppose the PRO Act. Sincerely, Heather Greenaway Executive Director Workforce Fairness Institute See the letter here.
Read More