Big Labor’s Vision For The Future Nothing More Than Extension Of Job-Killing Policies

Fred Wszolek
August 27, 2012
Pajamas Media

Recently, Big Labor bosses converged on Philadelphia to issue their latest demands of Washington, DC.  The event, labeled “Workers Stand for America Rally,” purported to offer a positive vision of the future.  But the so-called “Second Bill of Rights” proposed by union bosses represents the same old job-killing policies Big Labor has pushed for years.

Rather than emitting the air of a confident movement promoting a progressive agenda, the so-called “Second Bill of Rights” has more of the feel of petulant demands from a desperate and dwindling special interest lobby that has alienated elected officials in Washington with its unreasonable demands and can only resort to bullying the rest.

Big Labor feels its grasp on power brokers in the nation’s capital slipping.  With dwindling labor participation and diminished influence among the American electorate, union bosses are making a push to secure more power before it is too late.

And Big Labor’s newest push consists leveraging bureaucratic connections at relatively obscure government agencies that nevertheless wield considerable power, such as the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) and the National Mediation Board (NMB).

In a recent decision, the NLRB is allowing unions to form small collective bargaining units known as micro-unions with as few as two workers inside one department.  Without the ability to unionize full workforces, Big Labor came up with this new idea by virtue of a good friend on the NLRB, Craig Becker.  Prior to his recess appointment to the NLRB, Mr. Becker was counsel to the Service Employees International Union (SEIU).  Since handing labor this victory, he has since returned to claim his reward, this time at the American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations (AFL-CIO), where he serves as general co-counsel.

But micro unions isn’t the only way that the NLRB is stacking the deck in favor of labor – they also green-lighted ambush elections.  Giving unions the ability to force an election in a workplace in as few as 10 days, these quickie elections stack the deck against businesses drastically increasing the bosses’ success in unionizing.  With just a few days between the time the petition is filed and an election takes place, small businesses with limited resources don’t have enough time to seek outside counsel and make their case to employees.

What’s worse is that even the NLRB isn’t playing fair.  The ambush election rule has since been thrown out by the D.C. District Court after it found that the rule passed without a quorum of the board present.  But, those are the stop at nothing tactics that characterizes Big Labor these days.

The “Second Bill of Rights” tries to capitalize on the class warfare theme that the Obama Administration and Congress have been pushing for months.  Except, America isn’t buying it this time around.  The so-called “Second Bill of Rights” seeks a government that confiscates and distributes private resources to the benefit of union bosses and detriment of employees and employers.  The end result would be less freedom and economic ruin.

In Big Labor’s “Second Bill of Rights,” America as a whole becomes weaker – but union bosses enhance their power.  And, that is really what their vision for the future is all about.

Fred Wszolek is a spokesperson for the Workforce Fairness Institute (WFI).


Featured Blog

AZ Daily Sun--Coconino Voices: PRO Act legislation would hurt local businesses

— 05.13.2021 —
By: Julie Pastrik Arizona businesses and workers have had an incredibly challenging year given the economic slowdown that followed in the wake of the coronavirus pandemic. However, local businesses and industries across the state are resilient and on the road to a strong recovery that will mean more jobs for Arizona workers and increased economic development to strengthen our communities. That is, as long as Congress does not move forward with potentially devastating legislation that would hurt local employers and employees alike while impeding our state’s economic recovery. Unfortunately, some members of Congress seem determined to do just that by pushing through the Protecting the Right to Organize (PRO) Act. As harmless as the name may sound, the PRO Act would have serious repercussions for local businesses, particularly smaller ones, while undermining long-standing rights for employees and threatening the growing gig economy that has helped provide much-needed income for so many during this time. Arizona is fortunate to have leaders like Senators Mark Kelly and Kyrsten Sinema, who have both refrained from joining the vast majority of their Democratic colleagues in cosponsoring the PRO Act. In a slap in the face to Arizona workers, the PRO Act removes one of the most fundamental rights a worker has when it comes to voting in elections to determine whether to unionize: the secret ballot. Instead, workers could be forced to sign union authorization cards in front of other employees, their employer, or union organizers. This bill would also destroy workers’ right to privacy by allowing unions access to personal information, including their home address and personal phone number. If that doesn’t open the door to union intimidation and harassment, I don’t know what does. As if that was not bad enough, the PRO Act would create major new challenges for Arizona businesses, making it harder for them to create jobs, expand in their communities, and even keep their doors open. It would redefine what it means to be a “joint employer” under national labor law, greatly complicating existing relationships between franchisors and franchisees as well as between business owners, contractors, subcontractors, and vendors and suppliers. At the same time, it would interfere with attorney-client confidentiality and make it much more difficult for small businesses to secure a legal advice on labor issues. Particularly harmful during these times, the PRO Act would apply a failed policy from California to national labor law by using the “ABC” test to determine whether a worker is an independent contractor or employee. This makes it much harder to qualify as an independent contractor, threatening the freedom and flexibility that tens of thousands of Arizonans find in independent contracting and gig economy work. Ultimately, the PRO Act is bad public policy that only works for union leaders to inflate their falling ranks while threatening workers’ rights, undermining small businesses, and jeopardizing a growing part of our economy. This is not a good solution for Arizona, and Senators Sinema and Kelly should stay firm and not cosponsor this misguided legislation.
Read More