Alliance Releases New Video Showing Culinary Union Boss Protests Result In Violence

Video Evidence Shows Distasteful Protest Activity Is Illegal By Big Labor’s Own Standards

(November 5, 2013) –Las Vegas, NV – The Alliance to Protect Nevada Jobs (APNJ) responded today to a letter sent on behalf of union bosses at the Culinary Union Local 226 to the Clark County Commissioners by releasing new footage discrediting their argument.

The union letter states that their ongoing protest outside The Cosmopolitan is legal and protected free speech that can only be punished if their picketing amounts to “fighting words.” However, new footage obtained by The Alliance to Protect Nevada Jobs shows a fight breaking out during one of these protests. This video, which was secured on October 12, 2013 outside of The Cosmopolitan, shows a visitor being harassed by a union thug, calling him a “loser” with a megaphone before he was set to enter the facility. The visitor confronts the union thug and the incident turns violent before being broken up by others at the scene.

Last week, APNJ sent a letter to the County Commissioners of Clark County asking them to enforce the law and arrest the Culinary Union leaders who are inciting aggression by attacking tourists visiting Las Vegas, while protesting on the strip. Chapter 12.33 of the county Code makes it unlawful for “any person” “to challenge another person to a fight,” “incite a disturbance” or “interfere with, annoy, accost, or harass any other person with conduct which by its nature would tend to incite a disturbance.” The letter states, “This is precisely what the union is doing at The Cosmopolitan.”

“Union bosses continue to argue that they can essentially do anything they want so long as it doesn’t end in violence, whether it’s insulting tourists, racking up a sizeable bill on Clark County taxpayers, or creating an unsafe environment for Nevada families,” said David McGowan, State Director for the APNJ. “This new footage discredits their flawed argument that these protests are civil and within their rights and shows that, even by their own standard, they are in violation of the law. The actions are doing nothing to advance the interests of the workers they claim to represent, they are only serving to hurt Nevada families, businesses, and taxpayers. Our local officials should do what it takes to hold these union thugs accountable for their actions before it escalates into further acts of violence and gets out of control.”

To view the video, click here.


“ Culinary Union Bosses Argue That Ongoing Picketing Outside The Cosmopolitan Is Only Punishable If It Leads To Violence.”:

“The U.S. Supreme Court has repeatedly made clear that offensive speech cannot be punished unless and until it amounts to ‘fighting words’. Indeed, even the heinous behavior of the church which picketed servicemen’s funerals was recently held to be protected by the First Amendment. Snyder v. Phelps, 131 S.Ct. 1207 (2011). ‘Fighting words’ must involve ‘those personally abusive epithets which, when addressed to the ordinary citizen, are, as a matter of common knowledge, inherently likely to provoke violent reaction.’ Virginia v. Black, 538 U.S. 343, 359 (2003). ‘To characterize speech as actionable “fighting words,” the government must prove that there existed “a likelihood that the person addressed would make an immediate violent response.”’” (Letter, Richard G. McCracken To Clark County Commissioners On Behalf Of The Culinary Workers Local 226, 10/31/13)

About The Alliance to Protect Nevada Jobs (APNJ):

APNJ is a project of the Workforce Fairness Institute (WFI), whose mission is educate the public on issues related to workforce fairness, and to build greater public awareness of efforts that interfere with the good employer/employee relationships that most businesses enjoy. WFI has taken on similar efforts in other states to shine a spotlight on the questionable behavior union bosses engage in that usually hurts the very workers they represent.

The Workforce Fairness Institute is an organization committed to educating voters, employers, employees and citizens about issues affecting the workplace. To learn more, please visit:

To schedule an interview with a Workforce Fairness Institute representative, please contact Lauren Tate at (202)-677-7060.


Featured Blog

AZ Daily Sun--Coconino Voices: PRO Act legislation would hurt local businesses

— 05.13.2021 —
By: Julie Pastrik Arizona businesses and workers have had an incredibly challenging year given the economic slowdown that followed in the wake of the coronavirus pandemic. However, local businesses and industries across the state are resilient and on the road to a strong recovery that will mean more jobs for Arizona workers and increased economic development to strengthen our communities. That is, as long as Congress does not move forward with potentially devastating legislation that would hurt local employers and employees alike while impeding our state’s economic recovery. Unfortunately, some members of Congress seem determined to do just that by pushing through the Protecting the Right to Organize (PRO) Act. As harmless as the name may sound, the PRO Act would have serious repercussions for local businesses, particularly smaller ones, while undermining long-standing rights for employees and threatening the growing gig economy that has helped provide much-needed income for so many during this time. Arizona is fortunate to have leaders like Senators Mark Kelly and Kyrsten Sinema, who have both refrained from joining the vast majority of their Democratic colleagues in cosponsoring the PRO Act. In a slap in the face to Arizona workers, the PRO Act removes one of the most fundamental rights a worker has when it comes to voting in elections to determine whether to unionize: the secret ballot. Instead, workers could be forced to sign union authorization cards in front of other employees, their employer, or union organizers. This bill would also destroy workers’ right to privacy by allowing unions access to personal information, including their home address and personal phone number. If that doesn’t open the door to union intimidation and harassment, I don’t know what does. As if that was not bad enough, the PRO Act would create major new challenges for Arizona businesses, making it harder for them to create jobs, expand in their communities, and even keep their doors open. It would redefine what it means to be a “joint employer” under national labor law, greatly complicating existing relationships between franchisors and franchisees as well as between business owners, contractors, subcontractors, and vendors and suppliers. At the same time, it would interfere with attorney-client confidentiality and make it much more difficult for small businesses to secure a legal advice on labor issues. Particularly harmful during these times, the PRO Act would apply a failed policy from California to national labor law by using the “ABC” test to determine whether a worker is an independent contractor or employee. This makes it much harder to qualify as an independent contractor, threatening the freedom and flexibility that tens of thousands of Arizonans find in independent contracting and gig economy work. Ultimately, the PRO Act is bad public policy that only works for union leaders to inflate their falling ranks while threatening workers’ rights, undermining small businesses, and jeopardizing a growing part of our economy. This is not a good solution for Arizona, and Senators Sinema and Kelly should stay firm and not cosponsor this misguided legislation.
Read More