AFL-CIO Boss Dodges Legislative Nuclear Option Question

Card Check Real Threat To American Workers & Businesses

Washington, D.C. (December 19, 2013) – The Workforce Fairness Institute (WFI) issued the following statement in response to Richard Trumka, president of the American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations (AFL-CIO) who participated this morning in Politico’s Playbook Breakfast:

“Big Labor bosses have spent hundreds of millions of dollars buying access to elected officials, starting with President Obama and Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid. They have actively sought payback, and in return, received preferential treatment from both the executive and legislative branches, including confirmation of deeply flawed nominees to important federal agencies and obtaining an exemption from portions of the Affordable Care Act,” said Fred Wszolek, spokesperson for the Workforce Fairness Institute (WFI). “But what labor bosses have set their eyes on is the Employee ‘Forced’ Choice Act, legislation which will virtually eliminate the secret ballot and empower government bureaucrats to mandate contracts on employees and employers alike. Just today, when asked whether union bosses would seek the nuclear option on legislation, meaning the filibuster is no longer an option, in an effort to secure card check, AFL-CIO President Richard Trumka dodged the question focusing his rhetoric on obstructionism. To be clear, EFCA remains a very real threat and Big Labor will stop at nothing to obtain it – particularly when they have spent a fortune financing the campaigns of the same elected officials they expect to deliver a government takeover of America’s small business.”


QUESTION: Reporter: “Let’s say there’s a Democratic majority in the House and the Senate, would you push for the use of the nuclear option on legislation to enact card check?”

ANSWER: AFL-CIO President Richard Trumka: “I … On the House side? There is no nuclear … well the filibuster you’re talking about … I … You know look, I think you’ve got a normal process that you normally go through. When somebody becomes obstructionist then I think you have to do something. You look at what’s happening, on the Senate side these guys have filibustered more in the last three years than they have the 30 years combined before that. They filibuster people for every position, take the three judges here in the D.C. Circuit. Nina Pillard, exemplary, well we’re going to do that because until you do something on taxes … You know, three quality judges that they just filibustered. You know, that stuff’s got to stop. It’s got to stop some way and I hope it stops at the ballot box. I hope that the American people say, we’ve had enough of this, you’re an obstructionist, you care more about a political issue than you do about this country, we’re going to vote against you. And barring that, then they did a rules change on appointments, well at this point in the President’s administration he’s five years in. You have more vacancies than any other President before him. He can’t even get normal people appointed to make the government run. Now that is part of their strategy, they want to make government look bad, you don’t put the people in that can make it run so it looks bad so they can say see how bad it looks don’t put more people in. It’s part of their strategy and we’ve got to break through that, we really do.” (Politico’s Playbook Breakfast, 12/19/13)


Union Bosses Demand EFCA As “Payback.” “Gerald McEntee, president of the influential American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees, told The Washington Times in an interview that EFCA was ‘payback’ for the labor movement’s massive campaign effort for Mr. Obama and the Democrats … ‘I think our people have to be able to see that the Democrats, including Obama, are fighting … for these kinds of things and not backing off or backing away,’ Mr. McEntee said.” (David R. Sands, “Labor’s ‘Priority’ On Back Burner,” The Washington Times, 12/29/08)

The Workforce Fairness Institute is an organization committed to educating voters, employers, employees and citizens about issues affecting the workplace. To learn more, please visit:

To schedule an interview with a Workforce Fairness Institute representative, please contact Lauren Zelt at (202)-677-7060.


Featured Blog

AZ Daily Sun--Coconino Voices: PRO Act legislation would hurt local businesses

— 05.13.2021 —
By: Julie Pastrik Arizona businesses and workers have had an incredibly challenging year given the economic slowdown that followed in the wake of the coronavirus pandemic. However, local businesses and industries across the state are resilient and on the road to a strong recovery that will mean more jobs for Arizona workers and increased economic development to strengthen our communities. That is, as long as Congress does not move forward with potentially devastating legislation that would hurt local employers and employees alike while impeding our state’s economic recovery. Unfortunately, some members of Congress seem determined to do just that by pushing through the Protecting the Right to Organize (PRO) Act. As harmless as the name may sound, the PRO Act would have serious repercussions for local businesses, particularly smaller ones, while undermining long-standing rights for employees and threatening the growing gig economy that has helped provide much-needed income for so many during this time. Arizona is fortunate to have leaders like Senators Mark Kelly and Kyrsten Sinema, who have both refrained from joining the vast majority of their Democratic colleagues in cosponsoring the PRO Act. In a slap in the face to Arizona workers, the PRO Act removes one of the most fundamental rights a worker has when it comes to voting in elections to determine whether to unionize: the secret ballot. Instead, workers could be forced to sign union authorization cards in front of other employees, their employer, or union organizers. This bill would also destroy workers’ right to privacy by allowing unions access to personal information, including their home address and personal phone number. If that doesn’t open the door to union intimidation and harassment, I don’t know what does. As if that was not bad enough, the PRO Act would create major new challenges for Arizona businesses, making it harder for them to create jobs, expand in their communities, and even keep their doors open. It would redefine what it means to be a “joint employer” under national labor law, greatly complicating existing relationships between franchisors and franchisees as well as between business owners, contractors, subcontractors, and vendors and suppliers. At the same time, it would interfere with attorney-client confidentiality and make it much more difficult for small businesses to secure a legal advice on labor issues. Particularly harmful during these times, the PRO Act would apply a failed policy from California to national labor law by using the “ABC” test to determine whether a worker is an independent contractor or employee. This makes it much harder to qualify as an independent contractor, threatening the freedom and flexibility that tens of thousands of Arizonans find in independent contracting and gig economy work. Ultimately, the PRO Act is bad public policy that only works for union leaders to inflate their falling ranks while threatening workers’ rights, undermining small businesses, and jeopardizing a growing part of our economy. This is not a good solution for Arizona, and Senators Sinema and Kelly should stay firm and not cosponsor this misguided legislation.
Read More