FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE                                            
April 24, 2019
CONTACT: Ryan Williams


Unions Spent $2B On Politics In 2018

Sean Higgins
April 23, 2019
Washington Examiner

Unions spent more than $2 billion on politics in 2018, according to a study released Tuesday by the nonprofit National Institute for Labor Relations Research.

Union spending was up $300 million from 2016, a presidential election year, indicating that unions are now spending more at the state and local level.

Nearly a quarter of the 2018 spending, $479 billion, went directly to state politics, more than double what the Labor Research group found in the previous election cycle. That finding is based on data from the Labor Department, the Federal Election Commission, and the nonprofit Center for Responsive Politics. The amount of state and local spending may actually be higher than reported, the Labor Research group said, due to the fact that unions have limited disclosure requirements in their federal filings and much of the funding may be “heavily misclassified.”

The switch comes as unions are fighting a trend by states to adopt right-to-work laws, which prohibit workers from being forced to either join a union or pay one a regular fee. Four states have adopted the laws since 2013, but a fifth one, Missouri, voted to repel such a law in 2018. The same year, a Supreme Court decision, Janus v. American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees, effectively said that state and local public sector workers are under right-to-work protections. Unions are pushing friendly state legislatures to counter the ruling.

“It’s no surprise that Big Labor unloaded their multi-billion-dollar warchest in the 2018 election cycle to push for candidates willing to grant union bosses enormous privileges in direct opposition to worker freedom,” said Mark Mix, president of the National Right to Work Foundation. “Union bosses spend employees’ hard-earned money to support political agendas that undermine the rights of the employees they claim to ‘represent.'” The National Institute for Labor Relations Research group is the foundation’s research arm.

AFL-CIO President Trumka said Tuesday at a forum hosted by the Economic Club of Washington D.C. that unions had begin to turn the tide against right-to-work laws by pressing the case against them in key states like Michigan and Wisconsin. “We’ll get those [state laws] both reversed. The last one that happened [to adopt the law] was in Missouri. It was on the ballot and 67 percent of the people who lived in Missouri voted to repel right to work,” he said. Trumka said the unions were also focusing more on state and local level elections, claiming that in the last election unions helped to elect 960 people at various levels of government.

The Labor Research group noted that more than $1.3 billion of the $2 billion spent in 2013 came directly from union treasuries, meaning it was funded directly by workers, through their union dues, who may not have been supportive of this spending. Trumka revealed last year that the AFL-CIO’s own polling showed that Democratic candidate Hillary Clinton beat President Trump among union voters 58%-36%, the lowest margin for a Democrat in recent decades. Clinton’s total was 10 percentage points lower than Obama’s in 2012 while Trump exceeded 2012 GOP candidate Mitt Romney by 3 points. This was despite the AFL-CIO and other major unions endorsing Clinton and heavily lobbying their own members to back her.

To access the article, click here.

Featured Blog

AZ Daily Sun--Coconino Voices: PRO Act legislation would hurt local businesses

— 05.13.2021 —
By: Julie Pastrik Arizona businesses and workers have had an incredibly challenging year given the economic slowdown that followed in the wake of the coronavirus pandemic. However, local businesses and industries across the state are resilient and on the road to a strong recovery that will mean more jobs for Arizona workers and increased economic development to strengthen our communities. That is, as long as Congress does not move forward with potentially devastating legislation that would hurt local employers and employees alike while impeding our state’s economic recovery. Unfortunately, some members of Congress seem determined to do just that by pushing through the Protecting the Right to Organize (PRO) Act. As harmless as the name may sound, the PRO Act would have serious repercussions for local businesses, particularly smaller ones, while undermining long-standing rights for employees and threatening the growing gig economy that has helped provide much-needed income for so many during this time. Arizona is fortunate to have leaders like Senators Mark Kelly and Kyrsten Sinema, who have both refrained from joining the vast majority of their Democratic colleagues in cosponsoring the PRO Act. In a slap in the face to Arizona workers, the PRO Act removes one of the most fundamental rights a worker has when it comes to voting in elections to determine whether to unionize: the secret ballot. Instead, workers could be forced to sign union authorization cards in front of other employees, their employer, or union organizers. This bill would also destroy workers’ right to privacy by allowing unions access to personal information, including their home address and personal phone number. If that doesn’t open the door to union intimidation and harassment, I don’t know what does. As if that was not bad enough, the PRO Act would create major new challenges for Arizona businesses, making it harder for them to create jobs, expand in their communities, and even keep their doors open. It would redefine what it means to be a “joint employer” under national labor law, greatly complicating existing relationships between franchisors and franchisees as well as between business owners, contractors, subcontractors, and vendors and suppliers. At the same time, it would interfere with attorney-client confidentiality and make it much more difficult for small businesses to secure a legal advice on labor issues. Particularly harmful during these times, the PRO Act would apply a failed policy from California to national labor law by using the “ABC” test to determine whether a worker is an independent contractor or employee. This makes it much harder to qualify as an independent contractor, threatening the freedom and flexibility that tens of thousands of Arizonans find in independent contracting and gig economy work. Ultimately, the PRO Act is bad public policy that only works for union leaders to inflate their falling ranks while threatening workers’ rights, undermining small businesses, and jeopardizing a growing part of our economy. This is not a good solution for Arizona, and Senators Sinema and Kelly should stay firm and not cosponsor this misguided legislation.
Read More